Copyright Craze Gone too Far

June 13, 2007 at 11:56 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , ,

I just (don’t ask me how) stumbled over a website where somebody claims copyright for crocheting a circular shape with a hole in it:

SCRUNCHIE



The following pattern is my original design and can only be copied or printed for personal use.

Damn, I almost committed copyright theft. I was just about to crochet 12 napkin rings after this pattern and sell them on the stoop. Hey, but I am safe: She also offers a page with FREE crocheting patterns that ANYBODY may use and probably even for COMMERCIAL purposes. There’s a lot of money in the crocheting industry, I hear.

IS THERE ANYBODY HERE WHO COULD INTRODUCE THE YOUTH OF TODAY TO THE OPEN SOURCE AND COPYLEFT IDEA BEFORE THEY SUCCUMB TO THE PATH OF EVIL AND BEGIN CLAIMING COPYRIGHT ON THE WORD ‘PEACE’ BECAUSE THEY WROTE IT WITH THEIR OWN HAND AND PEN?

Arf.

TIME Inc. s*cks / Lose the right to your picture through adoption 28/40

March 24, 2007 at 9:43 am | Posted in TIME, Web 2.0 | 3 Comments
Tags: , , , ,

I did partake in the the craze about Brangelina’s latest addition to their family by posting of a picture of Pham Quang, now know as Pax Thien. This morning I found an email in my mailbox and this notification on the post’s site:

This blog post has been marked private by WordPress.com staff in response to a DMCA notice. Please remove the Time Inc copyrighted image before making this post public again. Please see our DMCA process and contact us if you have concerns.

How bizarre. Can they claim that? Technically, I did not take their picture at all, but simply entered the URL of _their_ picture in the image tag. I suppose they wouldn’t complain about me providing a text link to their website – technically, there is hardly any difference between the two methods. The image tag retrieves the image from their server to display on my website, the link opens their page first before it displays the image. If they don’t want such a thing to happen, they should develop a script that generates the images in such a way on their site that one cannot easily retrieve their URL.

Furthermore, I entered a total of two links (!) to their website. In academia, that would be properly referenced and no copyright theft. In doing so, I also generated traffic to their website, for free – but they obviously have no understanding of the workings of the web 2.0.

And generally, isn’t it questionable whether_they_have the rights to Pham’s picture? The individual automatically has the right to his/her picture – this only changes once somebody becomes a person of public interest. Does being adopted by a celebrity automatically mean that you lose the rights to your picture, that you become a public persona? I’m highly critical of that.

Anyhow, the conclusion of that is: No more links to TIME Inc. publications. They s*ck anyway.

Today is the 28th day of Lent.
Time to close down Guantanamo.
Add a banner to your blog too.

End Guantanamo

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.