Britney kicked out of restaurant for smearing food over her face

September 18, 2007 at 4:17 pm | Posted in Britney Spears, Food | 3 Comments
Tags: , , , ,

Since I have been such an avid follower of Britney news, you shouldn’t miss out on this one: Ms Spears was kicked out of Chateau Marmont’s restaurant for smearing a plate of food over her face. Shit! Unusually, there are no pictures of the incident this time.
Quote from msnbc:

“The diners were disgusted,” said a Sun source. “You wouldn’t expect that from a teenager in a fast-food joint.” The Spears spy added that, “Royalty have dined in this restaurant. Her behavior was totally unacceptable.”

Oh, and this is also the same Chateau Marmont on Sunset Boulevard where John Belushi OD’ed and died, Helmut Newton caused a car crash in the driveway and died and Lindsay Lohan rented a room for her clothes.

It’s a place where royalties dine, really.

Wow – somebody really cares for Britney

September 12, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Posted in Britney Spears, video, Viral | 7 Comments

Currently #1 of the viral video charts: Somebody pleading really intensely to leave Britney alone. Some strong emotions going on here. Too bad they’re wasted on a celebrity, although the cause is admirable.

The Britney Spears Video from VMAS! (Plus the latest upskirt and bum shots, Britney upskirt again, yes indeed)

September 12, 2007 at 8:57 am | Posted in Britney Spears | 11 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

MTV Overdrive has the VMAS 07 video , but only for US users, Germans and Austrians (and probably the rest) can watch Britney’s performance here on Britney caught upskirt again after the VMA? Sadly, it’s true that she has just had another ‘getting out of the car mishap’ – the reasons why this can happen in a custody fight and right after a stage accident like the VMAS are unfathomable. Click to get the full monty (or scroll down for the naked bum):

Britney's crotch, served by Egotastic

And while cabbage and I are having a discussion of whether or not to slap obese people (he says: “That response is misguided. It’s the fault of the system” and I say “That’s right, but they are an easy target for my anger. Have some German bread and think twice.”), I would just like to say one thing:

BRITNEY SPEARS IS NOT OVER-WEIGHT! By far not overweight! She simply has a normal body now, and they couldn’t get the photoshopped one on stage.

And she is also troubled and has seemingly lost the ability to relate to herself or bring together the public response to her personality and the true dimensions of her actions. This is manifest in a psychologically convincing way in her other oops from early September: She forgot to put on the second one of her contact lenses and, once again, her undies:

Britney bare bum

If you ask me: She wanted to dress sexy and, due to her psychological condition, wasn’t able to see that that ‘dress’ was too short and her bum ok for you and me, but not for celebrity paparazzi.

Boosting Your Blog Traffic, pt. 1: A Little Help From Britney

May 12, 2007 at 3:42 pm | Posted in Blogging, Britney Spears, Tagging, Tags, Web 2.0 | 5 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Last week I tried to boost my blog traffic by heeding Lenina’s advice that a bit of sleaze cannot harm anybody (actually, it can) but is good for the traffic. I blogged about Britney Spear’s latest publicity stunt. It was a rather bland post and didn’t even contain images or video (only links to images and videos), but the title was reminiscent of a Britney Spears title and also contained a reference to the last Hasselhof PR disaster. For further enhancement, I used rather salacious tags, such as ‘upskirt’, ‘boobies’, ‘nipples’ and ‘nude’.

Furthermore, I submitted the post to, which was probably a bit of a cheat because the only reasonable category was Video>People – as mentioned, it only contained links to videos and thus circumvented’s own recommendation to link directly to news stories and videos.

But boost my blog traffic it did:To this day, the post has only received one digg (which was my own), but it never the less helped to drive the traffic figures: In the past seven days, the post has received 802 hits, because people click on many more stories published on digg than they actually digg. ‘To digg’ a story means to express that one likes it by clicking on a ‘digg it!’ button. The more diggs, the higher the ranking on digg.

And these are my traffic ratings of the past eight days – the Britney Spears post was published on the 6th of May:

03/05/2007 – 75 views
04/05/2007 – 77 views
05/05/2007 – 75 views
06/05/2007 – 339 views
07/05/2007 – 1589 views
08/05/2007 – 295 views
09/05/2007 – 186 views
10/05/2007 – 149 views

Tomorrow, I’ll explain what happened on the seventh of May. It had nothing to do with Britney’s tits at all.

Oops, she did it again: Britney naked (yawn) and the Hoff, hassled

May 5, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Posted in Britney Spears, Celebrities, video | 7 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

EDIT: Here’s the latest post with VMA 2007 and the latest upskirt short form right after the event

That woman just can’t keep her clothes on. Photographs have emerged showing Britney Spears pose with a bare chest and flowers to cover her nipples. The upskirt crotch shots were bad enough, the pictures of her bald head that followed only to be topped by the pictures of her bald umbrella attack. And I doubt that caricatures like these will get her any closer to regaining custody of her kids either. Isn’t there anyone in her immediate environment who can help her gain control of her clothes and, more importantly, of her life?

EDIT: Because you asked for it: here is a pic from the latest nipple slip on June 12 2007:

Britney Nipple Slip

It must be really lonely at the top. What surprises me the most is that she (or her management, in case she has a management) does not even seem to try to avoid cameras, no matter which act she gets caught in. Normally such pictures get leaked by someone – even if you lose the right to your picture as a celebrity, that cannot possibly include nude pictures that weren’t intended for circulation. Unless they WERE intended for circulation of course. Maybe Britney should be considered a po-mo artist who celebrates the dispersal of identity. Here’s the video of her latest ‘performance’ in a night club – in full-playback, and the lousiest full-playback I’ve seen in a while (videos from The Sun take a while to load).

The Hoff is a much more reliable celebrity in that respect, with his own daughter leaking a video of him, rolling half-naked on the floor in a state of complete intoxication, trying to eat a burger. Someone should tell her that there is no point in arguing with drunks.

Create a free website or blog at
Entries and comments feeds.