Comments on: Wikipedia is better than Brockhaus Encyclopedia http://anaj.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/wikipedia-is-better-than-enclopedia/ Everyone knows diaries are full of crap. Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:41:23 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: alaneason http://anaj.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/wikipedia-is-better-than-enclopedia/#comment-6629 alaneason Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:00:14 +0000 http://anaj.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/wikipedia-is-better-than-enclopedia/#comment-6629 I read the Stern article. The big surprise was that (The German version) Wikedpdia wa also more ACCURATE than Brockhaus, which employed professional editors. "...Überraschend siegte Wikipedia beim stern-Test auch in der Rubrik "Richtigkeit". Angesichts der Tatsache, dass hier Freiwillige gratis gegen professionelle Redakteure antreten, war dies nicht zu erwarten..." 'Richtigkeit' means correctness. I read the Stern article. The big surprise was that (The German version) Wikedpdia wa also more ACCURATE than Brockhaus, which employed professional editors.

“…Überraschend siegte Wikipedia beim stern-Test auch in der Rubrik “Richtigkeit”. Angesichts der Tatsache, dass hier Freiwillige gratis gegen professionelle Redakteure antreten, war dies nicht zu erwarten…”

‘Richtigkeit’ means correctness.

]]> By: Kingguter http://anaj.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/wikipedia-is-better-than-enclopedia/#comment-6210 Kingguter Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:59:00 +0000 http://anaj.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/wikipedia-is-better-than-enclopedia/#comment-6210 While it may be better, It is very hard for anything to rival the Britannica. http://1info.110mb.com/ While it may be better, It is very hard for anything to rival the Britannica. http://1info.110mb.com/

]]>